Darwinian evolution is flippin' nonsense

You've probably seen a banana turn to mush but have you ever seen mush turn into a banana? Maybe if you left it long enough it would? Of course it wouldn't. It's impossible!

Yet some scientists expect you to believe that some 'primordial slime' gradually changed into you over millions of years!

There are many reasons why this is   backed up by an ever growing body of evidence from a range of scientific disciplines including biochemistry, physics, information theory and statistics - all of which I look at later. But consider this simple argument for now; The famous Cambridge professor Fred Hoyle stated that arguing that we got here via Darwinian evolution is equivalent to arguing that a tornado sweeping through a junkyard could assemble a jumbo jet.

No-one finding a 747 would argue that it had come together by accident. Everything about it shouts 'design!' Yet you are far more complex than a plane. A plane is not alive, it cannot grow or reproduce. Furthermore the natural tendency of the plane is to fall apart, to corrode - just as the natural tendency of a banana is to turn to mush.

This tendency for all things to go from order to disorder is encapsulated in a universal law known as the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. So fundamental is this law that another famous scientist, Arthur S. Eddington, stated that “If your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics, I can give you no hope; there is nothing for [your theory] but to collapse in the deepest humiliation.” Yet Darwinian evolution does just that. It sets itself against this fundamental law!

So why do some scientists cling to the theory of evolution? A good question which I'll explore more fully later. One straightforward but sad answer is that many biologists simply do not understand the implications of the 2nd Law. Here's another...

In 2007 the U.K. government published guidance on the teaching of Intelligent Design in Schools. A document full of misleading and false statements.

Our understanding of the cell has come a long way since Darwin's day. We now know that even the humblest bacterium has myriad chemical processes and miniature machines which cannot be explained by Darwinian evolution. See some incredible videos here.

The key to Darwinian evolution is the addition of new genetic information. Yet scientists now know that such addition is contrary to a fundamental law of the Universe. Even the eminent Richard Dawkins was stumped when asked to give an example of new information being added to the genome. See his interview here.

“The irony of this whole situation is that the very concept of organic evolution is completely absurd and impossible. It is absolutely astonishing that an idea which is so devoid of any legitimate scientific evidence could have attained a position of such prestige in the name of science.” See many other quotes from scientists....

Hundreds of scientists from around the world have added their name to this list of dissent from Darwinism.

'Evolution is Fact' - so announced Richard Dawkins in the final episode of his latest TV tirade recently. This is a flippin' absurd statement for any scientist to make.

'Evolution is Impossible' - I declare in response to Dawkin's crass statement (see above). Here I explain 4 scientific reasons why Darwinian Evolution could never have happened.

Darwinists are like the 17th century Catholic Church; Dismissing contrary scientific evidence and persecuting unbelievers in their 'religion'. We've been here before...

Is there any science in support of the Biblical account?